Timeline for How do we approximate the integral of the measurement contribution function in Metropolis Light Transport?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2018 at 18:01 | comment | added | 0xbadf00d | I still don't understand how the approximation is done. I've updated the question. Hopefully it's now clearer what exactly I'm asking for. | |
| Sep 10, 2018 at 20:40 | history | edited | Hubble | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 16 characters in body
|
| Sep 10, 2018 at 18:53 | comment | added | Hubble | Yes absolutely. It's an abuse of notation that is commonly used to bundle the pixel reconstruction filter and the function $f$ together. You are indeed approximating $f$. | |
| Sep 10, 2018 at 18:16 | comment | added | 0xbadf00d | In the notation of Veach's paper, shouldn't we approximate $f$ (with $f_j=h_jf$) instead of $f_j$? | |
| Sep 10, 2018 at 15:59 | history | answered | Hubble | CC BY-SA 4.0 |