Timeline for Bilinear Interpolation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2017 at 15:10 | comment | added | user2835098 | In both cases the equation doesn't add up. | |
| Oct 2, 2017 at 9:21 | comment | added | Dan Hulme | The $x_s$ and $y_s$ in that image are clearly in [-1,1] co-ordinates, not [0,W) co-ordinates. Obviously to make the subtraction work they both have to be in the same co-ordinate system. | |
| Oct 2, 2017 at 7:14 | comment | added | user2835098 | I am sorry for the incomplete addition to my question. Given that I am new, I cannot add another image to explain the values. You can view the image I was planning on putting in the following link dropbox.com/s/4jmcangptz1lftu/bilint_derivation11.png?dl=0. I will add this image to the question when my reputation is sufficient to include it. | |
| Oct 1, 2017 at 10:42 | comment | added | Dan Hulme | Where does this -0.833 come from in your example? Obviously if you sample outside the original image only the two border pixels will be closest. You have to express the sample points in the same co-ordinate system you're using for the pixels in the old image. | |
| Sep 30, 2017 at 11:44 | history | edited | user2835098 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2714 characters in body
|
| Sep 29, 2017 at 14:38 | answer | added | Dan Hulme | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 29, 2017 at 11:30 | review | First posts | |||
| Sep 29, 2017 at 18:37 | |||||
| Sep 29, 2017 at 11:26 | history | asked | user2835098 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
