Timeline for Why shouldn't Bump, Normal and Displacement maps be gamma corrected?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2016 at 7:58 | comment | added | joojaa | Well, true but it still does not really explain why. I admit I have the same problem i just mention the lack of benefit or harm done by such compression. There is no need but the why is that the data of images is peculiar due to human senses whereas our spatial reasoning is more linear in nature (as far as the 3D app is concerned) | |
| Aug 15, 2016 at 7:42 | comment | added | Julien Guertault | @user1118321: I believe it does. I added emphasis in an attempt to make it clearer. | |
| Aug 15, 2016 at 7:41 | history | edited | Julien Guertault | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Emphasis.
|
| Aug 15, 2016 at 3:05 | comment | added | user1118321 | This doesn't explain the "why" at all. It just reiterates the "what". | |
| Aug 10, 2016 at 21:05 | comment | added | Kristoffer Helander | How do you tell Photoshop to save an image with the gamma baked in as you said above: "And so does Photoshop if you tell it so." | |
| Aug 10, 2016 at 15:40 | history | answered | Julien Guertault | CC BY-SA 3.0 |