I encountered some problems when implementing the cloth simulation algorithm from Baraff & Witkin 98's [Large Steps in Cloth Simulation](http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~baraff/papers/sig98.pdf). ---------- **Baraff & Witkin 98** Consider the cloth as a particle system in 3D, which consists of N particles. 1. Equation of motion In each time step, the implicit integration of particle system is: $$ \begin{pmatrix} \Delta \mathbf x \\ \Delta \mathbf v \\ \end{pmatrix} = h\begin{pmatrix} \mathbf v_0 + \Delta \mathbf v \\ \mathbf M^{-1} \mathbf f(\mathbf x_0 + \Delta \mathbf x, \mathbf v_0 + \Delta \mathbf v) \\ \end{pmatrix} $$ where $h$ is the time step (scalar) 2. The partial derivative equation Take the 1st order Taylor expansion of $\mathbf f(\mathbf x_0 + \Delta \mathbf x, \mathbf v_0 + \Delta \mathbf v)$, and introduce constraint matrix $\mathbf S$ (make mass matrix from $\mathbf M^{-1}$ to $\mathbf M^{-1}\mathbf S$), we have: $$ (\mathbf I - h\mathbf M^{-1} \mathbf S\frac{\partial \mathbf f}{\partial \mathbf v} - h^2\mathbf M^{-1} \mathbf S\frac{\partial \mathbf f}{\partial \mathbf v})\Delta \mathbf v = h\mathbf M^{-1} \mathbf S(\mathbf f_0 + h\frac{\partial \mathbf f}{\partial \mathbf x} \mathbf v_0) + \mathbf z $$ Where all of the matrices are treated as $N\times N $ block matrices, eack block sizes $3\times 3 $; vectors as N block vector, each sized $3\times 3 $ (with N number of 3D forces/positions/velocities). - $\mathbf I$ is identical matrix - $ \mathbf M = diag(\mathbf M_1, \mathbf M_2, ..., \mathbf M_N) $, $\mathbf M_i = diag(m_i, m_i, m_i)$, mass of each particle - $ \mathbf S = diag(\mathbf S_1, \mathbf S_2, ..., \mathbf S_N) $, $ \mathbf S_i = \begin{cases} \mathbf I, & \text{$ndof(i) = 3$} \\ \mathbf I - \mathbf p_i \mathbf p_i^T, & \text{$ndof(i) = 2$} \\ \mathbf I - \mathbf p_i \mathbf p_i^T - \mathbf q_i \mathbf q_i^T, & \text{$ndof(i) = 1$} \\ \mathbf 0, & \text{$ndof(i) = 0$} \end{cases}$, constraint matrix (Baraff98 chapter 5.1) - $\frac{\partial \mathbf f}{\partial \mathbf v}$ and $\frac{\partial \mathbf f}{\partial \mathbf x}$ are symmetrical matrices . 3. solve the PDE The paper solves the aforementioned PDE by **Modified Preconditioning Conjugate Gradient Method** (Baraff98 chapter 5.2) for $\Delta \mathbf v$, then update the velocity $\mathbf v$ and position $\mathbf x$ of each particle. ---------- **My Questions** Solve $\mathbf A\mathbf x=\mathbf b$ with PCG method requires the matrix $\mathbf A$ to be symmetrical and positive-definite, where according to the aforementioned PDE, $\mathbf A = (\mathbf I - h\mathbf M^{-1} \mathbf S\frac{\partial \mathbf f}{\partial \mathbf v} - h^2\mathbf M^{-1} \mathbf S\frac{\partial \mathbf f}{\partial \mathbf v})$. 1. symmentrical Treat $\mathbf A$ as an $N\times N$ block matrix, $\mathbf M^{-1}$ and $\mathbf S$ are both block identity matrices, makes $\mathbf A$ a block symmetrical matrix. While $\mathbf A$ as $3N\times 3N$ matrix, $\mathbf S$ is not symmetrical, makes $\mathbf A$ not symmetrical. **Question 1**: should I treat $\mathbf A\mathbf x=\mathbf b$ as a block matrix rather than normal matrix? If not, how to make $\mathbf A$ symmetrical? I then modified the PDE as $\mathbf A^T\mathbf A\mathbf x=\mathbf A^T\mathbf b$, $\mathbf A^T\mathbf A$ is symmetrical. **Question 2**: How to make the `fliter` procedure (Baraff98 chapter 5.3) compatible with $\mathbf A^T\mathbf A\mathbf x=\mathbf A^T\mathbf b$? 2. positive-definite The blocks $\mathbf S_i$ in $\mathbf S$ may become zero block when $ndof(i) = 0$, which makes $\mathbf A^T\mathbf A$ a positive-semidefinite matrix, according to Baraff98 chapter 5.3, > The CG method (technically, the preconditioned CG method) takes a symmetric **positive semi-definite** matrix $\mathbf A$, a **symmetric positive definite** preconditioning matrix $\mathbf P$ of the same dimension as $\mathbf A$ ,a vector $\mathbf b$ and iteratively solves $\mathbf A \Delta \mathbf v = \mathbf b$. **Question 3**: How to find the symmetrical and positive-definite preconditioning matrix $\mathbf P$, with $\mathbf A^T\mathbf A$ symmetrical and semi PD?