In this post, Nathan-Reed gave a simple, neat, "heuristic" estimation for the discrete curvature at vertices of a mesh.

In a nutshell, it computes a curvature along each edge incident to the vertex, then takes the geometric mean for the curvature in the vertex.

My question is: why is it better to take the geometric mean, instead of the arithmetic mean?

Is it because that would resemble somewhat Gaussian curvature?



Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.