I created two ellipses,
where the red ellipsis is as the blue one, except translated to the right and rotated by ${30}^{\circ} .$ Using rotation matrix,

$$ \left[ \begin{array}{cc} x \\[2px] y \end{array} \right] \ \phantom{F} ~=~ \left[ \begin{array}{cc} cos(30^{\circ}) & -sin(30^{\circ}) \\[2px] sin(30^{\circ}) & \phantom{}cos(30^{\circ}) \end{array} \right] \ * \left[ \begin{array}{cc} X \\[2px] Y \end{array} \right] \ $$

Next I tried to calculate deformation gradient by using principal axes(a and b for initial ellipsis,c and d for translated one), and then I decomposed $\vec{c}$ and $\vec{d}$ vectors,$$ \begin{alignat}{7} \vec{c} &~~=~~ 1.0021 \, \vec{b} &~&+ &~&0.8654 \, \vec{a} \\[5px] \vec{d} &~~=~~ 0.8654 \, \vec{b} &&- &&0.2505 \, \vec{a} \end{alignat} $$and created the deformation gradient as$$ F ~=~ \left[ \begin{array}{cc} \phantom{-} 0.8654 & 1.0021 \\[2px] - 0.2505 & 0.8654 \end{array} \right] \,. $$But it is obvious that, this is not the same as the ${30}^{\circ}$ rotation matrix that I had expected it to be,$$ \phantom{F} {\llap{\textsf{rotation matrix}}} ~=~ \left[ \begin{array}{cc} 0.8660 & - 0.5000 \\[2px] 0.5000 & \phantom{-} 0.8660 \end{array} \right] \,. $$

Question: Why aren't the deformation gradient, $F ,$ and and the rotation matrix, $\textsf{rotation matrix} ,$ the same?

  • $\begingroup$ I'm not sure your rotation matrix is correct, usually the sin/cos are swapped in the second row e.g [ cos -sin ] [ sin cos ] $\endgroup$ – PaulHK Aug 30 '18 at 8:59
  • $\begingroup$ @PaulHK, silly mistake while writing it,i rewrite it, now its in the correct form. $\endgroup$ – Onur Berk Töre Aug 30 '18 at 9:12
  • $\begingroup$ The c and d vectors do not look correct in the diagram. They should be equivalent to a and b but rotated. How are you finding those vectors? Maybe there's a bug there. $\endgroup$ – Nathan Reed Aug 30 '18 at 17:16
  • $\begingroup$ @NathanReed isnt them correct ? There is an small error margin, but compared to difference between rotation matrix and F, its nothing. $\endgroup$ – Onur Berk Töre Aug 30 '18 at 19:07
  • $\begingroup$ I don't think it's a small error margin. The component of c along b, and the component of d along a, are both off by about a factor of 2. The vectors as shown in the diagram are plainly quite a bit off from the true axes of the red ellipse. $\endgroup$ – Nathan Reed Aug 30 '18 at 19:14

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.