1
$\begingroup$

I think this is one of the most important part when you write a physically-based renderer.

The solution I came up with is to put a sphere to the scene with a constant background radiance. Solve the rendering equation analytically for constant radiance which you have chosen. There will be no recursion in the integral since the rays will not bounce more than one. After that, compare result of the rendered image and the analytic solution. Does this make sense?

Are there any ways to this more effectively?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ You are right. Glossy surfaces could be a problem. Even if the procedure is done for a particular outgoing direction, it does not prove that the model is correctly implemented for the other outgoing directions. Also, I am surprised that I couldn't find a useful resource or a question when I google it. $\endgroup$ May 15, 2018 at 11:09

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.