7
$\begingroup$

Assume that we have voxelized a 3D scene into a regular 3D grid of cubes, storing the average (diffuse) radiance and some flag indicating whether or not a voxel is empty. Next, the finer levels of the 3D texture (voxels) are downsampled to get coarser levels ("pre-integrated") which will be stored as MIP levels for that texture. (I know that some sparser structures can be used instead, but a regular grid is conceptually the most easiest to master first.)

Now, given that we have our surface position (and thus also the voxel we are in), how does voxel cone tracing work and how is it applied?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

Illumination components

If our scenes only contain point lights (e.g., omni lights, spotlights, etc.) and emissive surfaces, the illumination contributions at a surface position, $x$, are computed as follows:

  1. The self emission associated with the emissive surface (i.e. 0 bounces/surface interactions) is computed as usual without using the scene's voxelization (as is the case for adding this illumination contribution to the scene's voxelization);
  2. The direct illumination associated with the point lights (i.e. 1 bounce/surface interaction) is computed as usual without using the scene's voxelization (as is the case for adding this illumination contribution to the scene's voxelization);
  3. The direct illumination associated with the emissive surfaces (i.e. 1 bounce/surface interaction) is obtained from the scene's voxelization using voxel cone tracing;
  4. The indirect illumination associated with the point lights (i.e. 2 bounces/surface interactions) is obtained from the scene's voxelization using voxel cone tracing.

By computing the diffuse illumination for all the voxels from the scene's voxelization using voxel cone tracing, the diffuse illumination from additional bounces/surface interactions can be (optionally) accumulated inside the voxels. This requires each voxel to store (an approximation) to the normal distribution of the scene's surfaces overlapping those voxels as well.

Illumination from the scene's voxelization (3)-(4)

The outgoing radiance obtained from the scene's voxelization ($L_v$):

$$L_o\!\left(x, \hat\omega_o\right) = \int_\Omega f_{r}\!\left(x, \hat\omega_o, \hat\omega_i\right) L_v\!\left(x, \hat\omega_i\right) \left(\hat{n} \cdot \hat\omega_i\right) \mathrm{d}\hat\omega_i.$$

For a diffuse BRDF $f_{r}\!\left(x, \hat\omega_o, \hat\omega_i\right) = \frac{k_d}{\pi}$:

$$L_o\!\left(x, \hat\omega_o\right) = \frac{k_d}{\pi} \int_\Omega L_v\!\left(x, \hat\omega_i\right) \left(\hat{n} \cdot \hat\omega_i\right) \mathrm{d}\hat\omega_i.$$

For a partitioning of $\Omega$ in $N$ disjunct subdomains, $\Omega_j$, (e.g., $\approx$ cones) (i.e. $\Omega_1 \cup~...~\cup \Omega_N = \Omega$ and $\Omega_i \cap \Omega_j = \emptyset$ for each $i \ne j$):

$$L_o\!\left(x, \hat\omega_o\right) = \frac{k_d}{\pi} \sum_{j = 1}^{N} \int_{\Omega_{j}} L_v\!\left(x, \hat\omega_{j,i}\right) \left(\hat{n} \cdot \hat\omega_{j,i}\right) \mathrm{d}\hat\omega_{j,i}.$$

Relying on a single cone with a direction, $\hat\omega_{j}$, and an aperture, $\alpha_{j}$, instead of individual rays with a direction, $\hat\omega_{j,i}$, for each subdomain, $\Omega_j$:

$$L_o\!\left(x, \hat\omega_o\right) \approx \frac{k_d}{\pi} \sum_{j = 1}^{N} L_v\!\left(x, \hat\omega_{j}, \alpha_{j}\right) \int_{\Omega_{j}} \left(\hat{n} \cdot \hat\omega_{j,i}\right) \mathrm{d}\hat\omega_{j,i}$$

$$\hat{W}_j = \frac{1}{\pi} \int_{\Omega_{j}} \left(\hat{n} \cdot \hat\omega_{j,i}\right) \mathrm{d}\hat\omega_{j,i}$$

$$L_o\!\left(x, \hat\omega_o\right) \approx k_d \sum_{j = 1}^{N} \hat{W}_j L_v\!\left(x, \hat\omega_{j}, \alpha_{j}\right).$$

We can use for example the following six cones, each with an aperture of $\frac{\pi}{6}$.

The normalized weight of the blue cone about the surface normal is equal to:

$$\hat{W}_{\mathrm{blue}} = \frac{1}{\pi} \int_{0}^{2\pi} \int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{6}} \cos\!\theta \sin\!\theta \, \mathrm{d}\theta \, \mathrm{d}\phi = \frac{1}{4}.$$

The normalized weight of the other cones is approximately equal to:

$$\hat{W}_{\mathrm{purple|red|green|orange|brown}} \approx \frac{1-\hat{W}_{\mathrm{blue}}}{5} = \frac{3}{20}.$$

For a specular BRDF, one typically uses a single cone with a direction, $2 \left(\hat{n} \cdot \hat\omega_o\right) \hat{n}-\hat\omega_o$ (i.e. reflected direction of $\hat\omega_o$ about $\hat{n}$), and an aperture based on the roughness of the surface material.

Voxel Cone Tracing

$L_v\!\left(x, \hat\omega_{j}, \alpha_{j}\right)$ is computed using voxel cone tracing, which can be implemented by marching the mip-mapped 3D voxel texture in UVW texture space.

Our accumulated radiance (red, green, blue channels) and opacity (alpha channel) are initialized to zero.

Lv ← [0, 0, 0, 0]

Our cone marching distance is initialized to an offset to avoid sampling the self emission associated with the emissive surfaces and the direct illumination associated with the point lights twice. We need to basically skip the voxel containing the surface position for which the outgoing radiance needs to be estimated.

distance ← voxel_offset

Marching continues until we reach an accumulated opacity of 1 or more:

while Lv.alpha < 1:
    compute diameter (i.e. cone voxel footprint)
    compute mip_level
    compute position at distance
    if mip_level >= max_mip_level or position ∉ [0,1]^3
        break
    sample Lv_step(position, mip_level)
    Lv ← Lv + (1-Lv.alpha) * Lv_step // blend equation
    distance ← distance + cone_step  // marching -> diameter and mip_level will increase
return Lv

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.