For a non-computer graphics expert, what happens technically when you do this? Are multiple pixels merged to one to compensate for the lower resolution? And in how far will this affect the image quality?

Would a high resolution image look sharper on a low resolution display than if the same image would have the exact same resolution as the screen?

  • $\begingroup$ If you know the final display size, scaling your original, highest quality image to the display size with a good graphics application should produce as good as or better than letting the display system do it for you (which is likely to cut corners for performance/simplicity). $\endgroup$
    – user2500
    Commented Feb 12, 2016 at 15:08

1 Answer 1


If you scale an image down to a screen that has a lower resolution than yout image, you have to descide what you do, there is no single way of doing this.

There are many different techniques that yield very different results. This is very similar to displaying a low resolution image on a high resolution display where do the inverse thing by desciding how to fill the "more" pixels on the screen. There are also many techniques for doing this.

Image scaling comparison. Nearest-neighbor scaling (left) and 2*Sal scaling (right).

The image shows two upscaling-techniques and shows how different the results can look if different techniques are used. (A nearest-neighbor scaling on the left and a 2*Sal on the right.) Imagine that there are also such differences if you downscale an image.

You can find a nice overview on different scaling techniques on the wikipedia page for Image scaling.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.