The photographic version shows much more detailed fur than the popular test image.
2
-
$\begingroup$ Hi, El-ahrairah. Welcome to the site! Do you have links for the images you're comparing? $\endgroup$– luser droog ♦Mar 10, 2022 at 2:01
-
1$\begingroup$ @luser droog Probably the third picture down in this article: faculty.cc.gatech.edu/~turk/bunny/bunny.html . There are also 289 light field images (not enough angles for photogrammetry, sadly) made with a Lego Mindstorms gantry here: graphics.stanford.edu/data/LF/lfs.html $\endgroup$– KickAir8pMar 11, 2022 at 1:10
Add a comment
|
1 Answer
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
The latest scan of the Stanford Bunny that I'm aware of was in January 2000, a CT scan: “The scale of the voxel data is 0.337891 mm x 0.337891 mm x 0.5mm in the x-, y-, and z-dimensions respectively. The greyscale units are Hounsfield units, denoting electron-density of the subject. The data is raw 512x512 slices, unsigned, 12 bit data stored as 16bit (2-byte) pixels.”
http://graphics.stanford.edu/data/voldata/voldata.html#bunny
That link includes a download of the data, although I don't know how to open the files. Even though the scan is later than the original 1994 range data, I'm not sure it can be considered higher resolution for 3D purposes.
