2
$\begingroup$

What I am trying to achieve

So I'm a fractal enthusiast and decided to build a 2D/3D fractal generator in WebGL using raymarching, with Typescript as scripting language. I've been a C#/Typescript dev for several years but having zero experience with 3d programming, I used Michael Walczyk's blog as a starting point. Some of my code I use here is derived from his tutorial.

I added the functionality that you can move through the object in my 3d raymarched world using WASDQEZC keys. WS = strafe forward-back, AD = strafe left-right, QE = strafe up-down, ZC = roll left-right. I combine this with a mouse look function which moves in the direction the mouse pointer is located on the rendering canvas. So what I want is total freedom of movement like in a spacesim. For this I am using a separate camera rotation matrix together with translation values and send them to the shader like this. So far I've got WS, AD and QE working okayish (please see 'my problem' to find out why).

  setCameraMatrix(): void {
    let cameraRotationMatrixLocation: WebGLUniformLocation = this.currentContext.getUniformLocation(this.currentProgram, "u_cameraRotation");
    let cameraTranslationLocation: WebGLUniformLocation = this.currentContext.getUniformLocation(this.currentProgram, "u_cameraTranslation");
    let foVLocation: WebGLUniformLocation = this.currentContext.getUniformLocation(this.currentProgram, "u_foV");

    //add point of camera rotation at beginning
    let cameraRotationMatrix: Array<number> = Matrix3D.identity();

    //set camera rotation and translation, Z-axis (heading) first, then X-axis (pitch), then Y-axis (roll)
    cameraRotationMatrix = Matrix3D.multiply(cameraRotationMatrix, Matrix3D.rotateZ(this.cameraRotateZ * Math.PI / 180));
    cameraRotationMatrix = Matrix3D.multiply(cameraRotationMatrix, Matrix3D.rotateX(this.cameraRotateX * Math.PI / 180));
    cameraRotationMatrix = Matrix3D.multiply(cameraRotationMatrix, Matrix3D.rotateY(this.cameraRotateY * Math.PI / 180));
    //cameraRotationMatrix = Matrix3D.multiply(cameraRotationMatrix, Matrix3D.translate(this.cameraTranslateX, this.cameraTranslateY, this.cameraTranslateZ));
    cameraRotationMatrix = Matrix3D.inverse(cameraRotationMatrix);

    let cameraPosition: Array<number> = [
      this.cameraTranslateX,
      this.cameraTranslateY,
      -this.cameraTranslateZ,
    ];

    this.currentContext.uniformMatrix4fv(cameraRotationMatrixLocation, false, cameraRotationMatrix);
    this.currentContext.uniform3fv(cameraTranslationLocation, cameraPosition);
    this.currentContext.uniform1f(foVLocation, this.foV);
  }

I tried adding the camera translation values to the camera matrix but that didn't work. I got weird distortion effects and couldn't get it right so I commented that line out and left it there for now for clarity. The reason I did it this way is because of the way my GLSL code is constructed:

The main function from the fragment shader with the call to the ray_march function. v_position is a vec2 with x,y coordinates coming from the vertex shader.:

    void main() {
      outColor = vec4(ray_march(u_cameraTranslation, u_cameraRotation * vec4(rayDirection(u_foV,v_position),1), u_world, vec3(u_light * vec4(0,0,0,1)).xyz ).xyz,1);
    }

The ray_march function I am using. This derives from the sample code in Michael Walczyk's blog.

    vec3 ray_march(in vec3 ro, in vec4 rd, in mat4 wm, in vec3 lightPosition) //ro = ray origin, rd = ray direction gt = geometry position after matrix multiplication
    {
        float total_distance_traveled = 0.0;
        const int NUMBER_OF_STEPS = 1024;

        float MINIMUM_HIT_DISTANCE = 0.001 * min_hit_distance_correction;

        const float MAXIMUM_TRACE_DISTANCE = 1000.0;

        for (int i = 0; i < NUMBER_OF_STEPS; i++)
        {
            vec3 current_position = ro + total_distance_traveled * vec3(rd);

            float distance_to_closest = map(current_position, wm);

            if (distance_to_closest < MINIMUM_HIT_DISTANCE) 
            {
              vec3 normal = calculate_normal(current_position, wm);
              vec3 outColor = vec3(1.0,0,0);
              vec3 v_surfaceToLight = lightPosition - current_position;
              vec3 v_surfaceToView = ro - current_position;

              //insert lighting code below this line

              return outColor;
            }

            if (total_distance_traveled > MAXIMUM_TRACE_DISTANCE)
            {
              break;
            }

            total_distance_traveled += distance_to_closest;
        }

        return vec3(0.25);//gray background
    }

The rayDirection function I am using.

  vec3 rayDirection(float fieldOfView, vec2 p) {
    float z = 1.0 / (tan(radians(fieldOfView) / 2.0));
    return normalize(vec3(p.xy, -z));
  }

My problem

I have issues moving and rotating my camera correctly in 3d world. I'm doing this by applying some trigonometry to get the movement right. E.g., when I move forward, that is the Z-axis. But when I make a 90 degree turn to the right the X-axis now becomes the Z-axis. I am using trigonometry to correct this and actually got something working but now I am stuck in a quagmire of trigonometry trying to get 'roll', rotation around the Z-axis working when being combined with rotations around the X and Z axis, with no end in sight and I have a feeling there must be a better and less complicated way. To see what I'm talking about, here is the code of the 'move' function:

  move(event: KeyboardEvent): void {
    
    //strafe forward-back
    let tXForwardBack: number = (Math.sin(this.cameraRotateY * Math.PI / 180) * Math.cos(this.cameraRotateX * Math.PI / 180)) * this.clipSpaceFactor * this.speed;
    let tYForwardBack: number = Math.sin(this.cameraRotateX * Math.PI / 180) * this.speed;
    let tZForwardBack: number = (Math.cos(this.cameraRotateY * Math.PI / 180) * Math.cos(this.cameraRotateX * Math.PI / 180)) * this.clipSpaceFactor * this.speed;

    //strafe up-down
    let tXUpDown: number = ((Math.sin(this.cameraRotateX * Math.PI / 180) * Math.sin(this.cameraRotateY * Math.PI / 180)) * this.clipSpaceFactor * this.speed);
    let tYUpDown: number = Math.cos(this.cameraRotateX * Math.PI / 180) * this.speed;
    let tZUpDown: number = Math.sin(this.cameraRotateX * Math.PI / 180) * Math.cos(this.cameraRotateY * Math.PI / 180) * this.clipSpaceFactor * this.speed;

    //strafe left-right without roll. TODO: implement roll
    let tXLeftRight: number = Math.cos(this.cameraRotateY * Math.PI / 180) * this.clipSpaceFactor * this.speed;
    let tYLeftRight: number = 0;
    let tZLeftRight: number = Math.sin(this.cameraRotateY * Math.PI / 180) * this.clipSpaceFactor * this.speed;

    switch (event.key) {
      case "w": { //strafe forward
        this.cameraTranslateX = this.cameraTranslateX + tXForwardBack;
        this.cameraTranslateY = this.cameraTranslateY - tYForwardBack;
        this.cameraTranslateZ = this.cameraTranslateZ + tZForwardBack;
        //this.cameraTranslateZ = this.cameraTranslateZ + (this.clipSpaceFactor * this.speed);
        break;
      }
      case "s": { //strafe back
        this.cameraTranslateX = this.cameraTranslateX - tXForwardBack;
        this.cameraTranslateY = this.cameraTranslateY + tYForwardBack;
        this.cameraTranslateZ = this.cameraTranslateZ - tZForwardBack;
        break;
      }
      case "a": {//strafe left
        this.cameraTranslateX = this.cameraTranslateX - tXLeftRight;
        this.cameraTranslateY = this.cameraTranslateY + tYLeftRight;
        this.cameraTranslateZ = this.cameraTranslateZ + tZLeftRight;
        break;
      }
      case "d": { //strafe right
        this.cameraTranslateX = this.cameraTranslateX + tXLeftRight;
        this.cameraTranslateY = this.cameraTranslateY - tYLeftRight;
        this.cameraTranslateZ = this.cameraTranslateZ - tZLeftRight;
        break;
      }
      case "q": { //strafe up
        this.cameraTranslateX = this.cameraTranslateX + tXUpDown;
        this.cameraTranslateY = this.cameraTranslateY + tYUpDown;
        this.cameraTranslateZ = this.cameraTranslateZ + tZUpDown;
        break;
      }
      case "e": { //strafe down
        this.cameraTranslateX = this.cameraTranslateX - tXUpDown;
        this.cameraTranslateY = this.cameraTranslateY - tYUpDown;
        this.cameraTranslateZ = this.cameraTranslateZ - tZUpDown;
        break;
      }
      case "z": { //roll left
        this.cameraRotateZ = (this.cameraRotateZ + (this.sensitivity * this.speed)) % 360;
        break;
      }
      case "c": { //roll right
        this.cameraRotateZ = (this.cameraRotateZ - (this.sensitivity * this.speed)) % 360;
        break;
      }
    }

It actually works to some degree, but you can see where this is going :( Also, I get a 'dead' zone in the center when I look up and down along the Y-axis. I found This thread which seems to describe my problem and says 'The trick is to apply the translation to the z-axis but in the local coordinate system of the camera.'

But how do I do that with my existing code? I tried multiplying the world matrix u_world by the rotationmatrix u_rotationMatrix but then the lighting changes as well and it's just an object rotation instead of a separate camera rotation. In the thread I posted there is no lighting so multiplying the camera matrix with the world matrix works for them. But it doesn't for me because of the lighting I implemented. Also, I can't seem to apply the normals separately this way so that I only apply the normals to the world matrix and not to the camera rotation matrix, so that the lighting stays in place when I rotate/translate the camera.

The only way I can get correct normals to the world matrix and a separate cameramatrix is by multiplying the rotationMatrix with the rayDirection like so u_cameraRotation * vec4(rayDirection(u_foV,v_position),1). But when I do this I have to apply all this horrible, partially working trigonometry mess to get something decent. What I want is getting it to work like 'The trick is to apply the translation to the z-axis but in the local coordinate system of the camera.'

But I don't know how. I tried all kinds of things but I'm currently stuck. Any help would be greatly appreciated. I think I've outlined my problem sufficiently enough, if you miss anything please let me know. I posted my question on StackOverflow earlier but I was told this was a more appropriate place. Thanks in advance.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Welcome to CGSE! Just had a quick look at your question without paying much attention to details but it sounds like it could be beneficial for you to take a look at quaternions. It is a different way to describe rotations. At first, they seem quiete complicated, but once you tried working with them, they are rather easy to use. $\endgroup$
    – wychmaster
    Oct 22, 2021 at 22:26
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Don't try to understand the theory behind them. Just search for some tutorials on how to use them. The equations you will need are pretty easy to implement. The theory is a bit more complicated and you don't need to understand it to work with quaternions. Once you feel compfortable using them, you can try to understand why it works ;) $\endgroup$
    – wychmaster
    Oct 22, 2021 at 22:38

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

A reliable way of getting the forward/left directions relative to the view is to use the camera rotation matrix itself to produce forward, Up and right vectors.

// The sign of the vector depends on your coordinate system (e.g. UP may be 0,0,-1 for you)

vec3 forward = rotMatrix * vec3(0,0,1);
vec3 up = rotMatrix * vec3(0,1,0);
vec3 right = rotMatrix * vec3(1,0,0);

With those vectors you can plug them into your movement code

e.g.

if(keyDown(W)) cameraPos += forward;
if(keyDown(S)) cameraPos -= forward;
if(keyDown(D)) cameraPos += right;
...
etc

Because this is using the rotation matrix it doesn't matter if your rotation matrix was built from Euler angles, quaternions, etc.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for your answer. Looks like all I had to do was change this section ray_march(u_cameraTranslation, into this vec4(ray_march(mat3(u_cameraRotation) * u_cameraTranslation and change the typescript code accordingly. So WS = only z-translation and no X and Y translation, AD = x-translation, QE = y-translation. The result of this is a bit different than what I had in mind, but this works with roll rotation too and now I can get rid of all the dreaded geometry. I was almost there myself, I tried moving the u_cameraRotation from rayDirection to u_cameraTranslation instead of copying. $\endgroup$ Oct 24, 2021 at 8:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.