In many resources the BRDF is defined like $$f_{r}(\omega_{i},\omega_{r}) = \frac{\mathrm{d}L_{r}(\omega_{r})}{L_{i}(\omega_{i})\,\cos{\theta_{i}}\,\mathrm{d}\omega_{i}}.$$ The index $r$ might be replaced by $o$ but overall the equation looks something like this. However, in some other resources I see the definition $$f_{r}(\theta_{i},\phi_{i};\theta_{r},\phi_{r}) \equiv \frac{\mathrm{d}L_{r}(\theta_{i},\phi_{i};\theta_{r},\phi_{r};E_{i})}{L_{i}(\theta_{i},\phi_{i})\,\cos{\theta_{i}}\,\mathrm{d}\omega_{i}}.$$ The second definition seems more precise to me as it – besides other things – clearly states that the BRDF in its purest form is a 4-dimensional function of two directions and clearly differentiates between the direction $(\theta_{i},\phi_{i})$ and the solid angle $\omega_{i}$.
It seems to me as if the first definition mixes up the direction of incidence and the solid angle in the direction of incidence. The symbol $\omega_{i}$ stands for the direction – at least I hope so as the BRDF is not a function of solid angles – to economize on writing, I understand that, but what is $\mathrm{d}\omega_{i}$ then? It must be the solid angle but $\omega_{i}$ is a direction, not a solid angle. Is $\mathrm{d}\omega_{i}$ simply a common way to express the solid angle in a specific direction? May I have misunderstood something?
Another thing I've noticed is that the solid angle in the definitions of radiance, luminance and basically all other radiometric and photometric quantities that deal with a solid angle is symbolized with $\Omega$, i.e. a big omega. Actually, as far as I can tell, solid angles are usually symbolized with $\Omega$. Why is it different in the definition of the BRDF? Am I missing something?